Ep 540: Solving the AI Productivity Paradox

Resources:

Join the discussion: Got something to say? Let us know here


Upcoming Episodes: Check out the upcoming Everyday AI Livestream lineup

Connect with Jordan Wilson: LinkedIn Profile

Try Our Free AI Prompting Course: Register for our free Prime, Prompt, and Polish AI Course! 


What is the "Productivity Paradox?"

The productivity paradox refers to the puzzling disconnect between rapid technological advancements—especially in artificial intelligence—and the slower-than-expected gains in business productivity. Despite the availability of AI tools that can automate hours of work in minutes, many companies still struggle to translate these innovations into measurable performance improvements.

This paradox often leaves leaders asking: if AI is so powerful, why aren't we seeing explosive growth? The answer lies in how technologies are integrated, measured, and managed across organizations. Without the right strategies in place, businesses risk investing in AI without realizing its full potential.

Why the Productivity Paradox Persists in Modern Workplaces

One driver of the productivity paradox is the shift to hybrid and remote work models. Many businesses still emphasize where employees work rather than how well they perform. This focus on physical presence over productivity outcomes can obscure the benefits of AI adoption.

Additionally, traditional enterprise cultures tend to resist change. Compared to agile startups, large companies are slower to implement AI in day-to-day workflows. This resistance contributes to the paradox—technology exists, but the systems around it don’t evolve fast enough to support real transformation.

How AI Can Help Solve the Productivity Paradox

Artificial intelligence offers a powerful remedy for the productivity paradox—if it’s used strategically. When integrated thoughtfully, AI can automate repetitive tasks, streamline communication, and analyze data faster than human teams ever could.

To realize these benefits, companies must:

  • Equip teams with AI tools tailored to their roles.
  • Train employees to use these tools effectively.
  • Shift from time-based management to results-driven metrics.
  • Encourage experimentation and iteration with AI solutions.

The goal isn't just to have AI available—it’s to embed it into the business culture, processes, and mindset.

Developing AI Policies to Align with Business Goals

Another key to breaking the productivity paradox is governance. Many businesses adopt AI tools without clear guidelines for use, leading to inconsistent results or even misuse. Creating formal AI policies ensures employees understand what tools they can use, how they should be used, and how AI supports broader business objectives.

These policies also help prevent inefficiencies that arise from fragmented tech stacks or over-reliance on external AI platforms. Building a secure, internal AI ecosystem can safeguard data while encouraging innovation across departments.

Leadership’s Role in Ending the Productivity Paradox

Business leaders play a central role in resolving the productivity paradox. They must lead the cultural shift toward AI-first thinking, setting expectations and modeling how to use AI effectively. Leadership should be fluent in what AI can do—not just technically, but in how it can unlock better decision-making, speed, and outcomes.

True productivity gains come when AI is seen not as a replacement for employees, but as a multiplier of human capability. Leaders who embrace this mindset are better positioned to guide their organizations through the transition from promise to performance.

Turning the Productivity Paradox into Progress

The productivity paradox is not a failure of AI—it’s a challenge of integration, measurement, and leadership. With the right approach, businesses can bridge the gap between technology investment and actual productivity gains.

By rethinking workflows, empowering teams, and aligning AI tools with meaningful goals, organizations can finally overcome the productivity paradox—and emerge stronger, faster, and more innovative than ever.


Topics Covered in This Episode:

  1. AI Productivity Paradox Explained
  2. Hybrid Work's AI Integration Challenges
  3. Generative AI Impact on Large Enterprises
  4. Raising Productivity Expectations in AI Era
  5. AI Tools vs. Traditional Employment Roles
  6. Effective AI Policy Implementation in Enterprises
  7. Building Internal AI Capabilities Strategy
  8. Insights from AI-Based Easy Button History


Keywords:

AI productivity paradox, generative AI, productivity improvements, employee experience, HP Digital Services, hybrid work, employee productivity, generative AI wave, AI tools, workforce experience platform, AI PCs, employee sentiment data, hybrid work challenges, generative AI boom, overemployment, AI policy, large enterprises, business leaders, remote work, Microsoft Copilot, improved productivity, customer experience, agentic workflows, AI-enabled tasks, augmented roles, future of work, AI solutions, digital transformation, management challenges, augmented society, productivity metrics, less is more approach, efficient work processes.


Podcast Transcript


Jordan Wilson [00:00:16]:
In theory, the whole AI thing should be fairly straightforward. Right? It helps employees do their jobs faster, which should increase revenue, which employers should be very happy about. It seems so simple. Yet there's sometimes this paradox, attached to it, right? The AI productivity paradox. Because here we are multiple years into this, generative AI wave. Right? Artificial intelligence has been around for many decades, yet some companies are still wondering, why aren't we maybe more productive if we're using AI? Why isn't, revenue soaring? And I think there's probably a lot of answers to those rhetorical questions, but don't worry. We have an expert today to help us figure it out, as we try to solve the AI productivity paradox. What's going on y'all? Welcome to Everyday AI.

Jordan Wilson [00:01:17]:
My name is Jordan Wilson, and I'm the host. And this thing, it's for you. This is your daily livestream, podcast, and free daily newsletter helping us all not just keep up and learn what's happening in the world of AI, but how we can actually leverage it to grow our company and our career. So if that's what you're trying to do, welcome. You're in the right place. It starts here by learning things on the podcast from very smart guests, but it ends by going to our website at youreverydayai.com. That's where you're going to leverage what we learned today. In our free daily newsletter, we're gonna be recapping the highlights of today's conversation as well as giving you bullet points of everything else that's happening in the world of AI so you can be the smartest person in AI in your company or your department.

Jordan Wilson [00:02:01]:
So, I'm excited for today's conversation. If you're looking for the daily AI news as we normally do, it's in the newsletter. Alright. We got a prerecorded one, coming coming for you. So, if you want the daily AI news, it's gonna be in the newsletter. So go check that out. Alright. Enough chitchat y'all.

Jordan Wilson [00:02:18]:
I'm excited for, today's show and today's guest. So please help me welcome to the show, Faisal Masud, the president of HP Digital Services. Faisal, thank you so much for joining the Everyday AI Show. 


Faisal Masud [00:02:25]:
Thanks for having me, Jordan. 


Alright. So for those people that aren't right, like, HP is obviously household name. Right? But, HP Digital Services for maybe those people that aren't aware, what is HP Digital Services?

Faisal Masud [00:02:42]:
Yeah. Great question. HP Digital Services was an organization that was formed, right around my arrival. HP's transition from, not just being a hardware company, that we all know of, supplying, industry leading devices, for both consumers and the workplace. We are transitioning into a software business as well. So what we realized along the way was, to have the the the future work be the center focus for HP, we needed to not just sell hardware but also software. So my team, digital services, runs all of the commercial software for HP.

Jordan Wilson [00:03:23]:
Love it. Love it. And, you know, for, people that may not know, like, what does that software actually do? What does it look like? Right? Because yeah. Like, a lot of people think of HP as one of the biggest hardware companies, in the world. Right? So what is the software, at HP Digital Services actually do for, for, clients?

Faisal Masud [00:03:43]:
Yeah. So we have a platform called workforce experience. This platform is basically solves the mystery around employee experience that most large enterprise and smaller companies face managing their fleet of devices. So we supply the fleet of devices, but how do you know if those devices are working as prescribed? How do you know if the employees are happy with those devices? How do you know if those applications are working as as they should? How do you know if they're secure? So our platform provides three core things to our our economic buyer, that's the CIO, and our users, which is security, reducing any of the ticketing that's needed on the long tail issues that come up on desk side support by using AI to solve those issues, and also collecting data on employee sentiment. So knowing if there's an issue with the machine, our, product is able to collect data on whether those machines are causing negative experiences for employees and how do you improve those, either by refreshing devices, improving the configurations, patching the software, etcetera. So our goal is to make, every employee's life easier and, lower the friction.

Jordan Wilson [00:04:55]:
So, you know, speaking of in a good transition, that's what generative AI is supposed to be doing. Right? But here we are a couple years into this generative AI wave, and it still seems like there's this paradox. Right? Like like, we we we have this extremely powerful technology that seemingly can do, you know, work that used to take hours and minutes. Yet not every single company is printing money. Right? It doesn't make sense. So, like, can you, like, tell us a little bit on what is this AI productivity paradox even about?

Faisal Masud [00:05:29]:
Yeah. It's you can look at it in different ways. One is just the the the paradigm shift that happened post COVID with just employees' relationship with the employer, you know, the nine to five, nine to six, nine to eight, whatever it is, used to be in the office, has moved over to hybrid. That introduces a challenge on its own. That's its own paradox. But, when you add GenAI to that where now the employers don't know, you know, where the employees are, so some of them are not exactly thrilled about that. But instead of focusing on the productivity itself, they're focusing on the proximity of the employees, whereas employees are looking at tools to improve their life day to day. And if I think about how AI is changing and evolving all of this, in most cases, you don't even see it.

Faisal Masud [00:06:16]:
I mean, our laptops that we ship, are AI PCs. Some of the work that they're doing behind the scenes is just something as simple as your background can be configured to whatever you want without you having to even deal with anything because it's it's running all of the all of the models on the machine. And, if you look at any traditional employee that is just doing their daily work, I would say vast majority of them today should be using AI to enhance their, their productivity. Is everybody doing it? We don't know. But I think that they that that shift towards that is happening pretty rapidly.

Jordan Wilson [00:06:53]:
You know, it's, it's funny you bring this up. Right? This, these culmination of events kind of happening at the same time. Right? So, you know, during COVID, you know, at least for our listeners, here in The US, right, we had a lot of people go straight hybrid or, you you know, still might be work you you know, work from home. You you know, still many years later, we never fully as, you know, US economic society transitioned back to five days in the office. Many companies have, but still so many are hybrid. So many are still work from home. And then at the same time, we have this generative AI boom. Right? So my thought is, are there still maybe thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of employees that might just be pocketing some of those time savings? Is that why all these companies, you know, aren't booming when, you know, GenAI promises thirty, forty, 50, 60 percent time savings?

Faisal Masud [00:07:46]:
Yeah. The answer to that would probably be it depends, which is not the best answer. I would say, if employers want to get the most out of their employees, it would be best to have a really high hiring bar and establish that trust. Because if you're hiring the best people, you know they're putting in a 50% every single day. Now if they're using AI to do that and finding some time savings along the way, how does that affect the employer at all? As long as you're getting exactly what you need, I think there's fair amount of satisfaction there. I think where the where the friction occurs is when there is a lack of productivity, there there is an issue with the performance, that's when employers immediately think, oh, this is because of hybrid. Well, is it? And that's where, I believe as somebody who's run teams and and has been on teams that, you have to find exactly what makes you most productive, which environment, whether it's in the office or not, and sometimes it's either one or the other. And the tools that make you productive such as using GenAI whenever needed and and deliver what's needed.

Faisal Masud [00:08:48]:
And and if you can't, that's a different issue. There are some pockets of challenges that have happened with this term called overemployment. I don't know if you've heard about it, actually, where people may have six, seven, you read about these things on Reddit, six, seven different gigs, and they're excelling at all six, seven. Well, then who's, whose fault is that? If they're excelling and getting exceeds expectations and all their reviews, then technically, they've done their jobs. So it's it's an unsolved mystery, but I feel like the answer is somewhere in the middle, which is, being hybrid, but at the same time, providing the level of, productivity the employees need. Yeah. So is

Jordan Wilson [00:09:25]:
is, like, when I think of this scenario, I think it is messy at times. Right? And I have both, you you know, friends, colleagues, you know, people I've talked to all the time that say, yeah. You know, I'm I'm work from home. I'm hybrid. I've, you know, automated 70% of my work and, you know, not all people I talk to have six or seven, you you you know, different gigs and excelling at them. But it seems like it's almost like the norm, for a lot of people, especially maybe around my age, maybe people that grew up with computers, right, but still are are kind of, like, quote, unquote, mid career still with something to prove. Right? And and now all of a sudden, they have a lot of time on their plates. Right? So how do business owners, business leaders solve that? Right? Because they don't necessarily wanna be, you know, micro like, known as a micromanaging company.

Jordan Wilson [00:10:16]:
Right? You you know, punch in or, you know, come back into the office. So how how can you still have that freedom for employees to do their job and maybe they're doing it well with AI in 20% of the time. Right? Where do you find the sweet spot there?

Faisal Masud [00:10:31]:
Yeah. I I think you need to separate the two things first, which is large enterprises typically lag start ups. So what you might see in these massive gains in productivity, whether it's through Copilot and coding and customer service or what have you, where you use GenAI, those savings don't quite translate into enterprises at the same scale or size or percentages. So what might be 40% here when you translate that to an enterprise, it's probably much smaller, a, y, Enterprises typically move not as fast and adopt not as quickly. So that's one. Second is, I think you have to raise the bar on the expectations. Why are why are employers still if if your expectation was to get to x, we'll now get to x plus and and see how the employee can catch up. And and and I think that the the task then is then in the hands of the the person doing the work to ensure that they can raise the bar themselves too from where it is today.

Faisal Masud [00:11:30]:
If you expect that, it's going to, you know, back in the day, customer service, which is the most basic use case, I would say, for for, AI where you can, you know, translate a lot of that to nonhuman activity. We would say you can answer a phone call and or or an email in sixty seconds. Well, why? You can answer it in two seconds, because you have AI. So so it's a the goalposts have changed. What you thought was the SLA, the service level that you expected, well, with GenAI and what's happening in AI should should no longer be the same. The expectations have changed. Like, when you when you walk into a really good store, you don't really wanna go to the one that didn't look quite as good as the previous one if you're shopping because the bar has been raised.

Jordan Wilson [00:12:11]:
I think this game applies to corporations and start ups and other companies and and business owners that what could be done in a day or could be done in two days a while back now can be done in hours. Well, then the expectation should be hours, not days. You know, raising the bar is a is a good concept to think about when it comes to, you know, specifically working in this age of, you know, remote hybrid plus AI. You you know, Fossil, your your background's very impressive. Right? So not only now, you you know, at HP, but I believe what you were at, Alphabet, Staples, Groupon, Amazon. Right? So you've worked in a lot of big enterprise companies. I've actually been a little shocked. So I've I've talked to, you know, mostly off the record, but, you know, people that work at big companies, you know, trillion plus dollar market cap that don't have AI policies.

Jordan Wilson [00:13:09]:
Right? Which is weird because it's also some of the companies building AI. Is I mean, is that to blame? Right? The fact that maybe, you know, big enterprise companies maybe just don't have an AI policy, and maybe that's why we're living in this paradox. Is is that a thing?

Faisal Masud [00:13:26]:
I I think that it's a it's a great point because it reminds me a little bit of back in the day when I was, hired to be chief digital officer at Staples. And for some reason, everybody thought this one organization is going to make the whole company digital. That's not how this works. The the notion of becoming digital is an endemic concept, right, it has to be in in the veins of the company. Everything you do has to be thought of digital first. Right? When back on the transition from desktop to mobile, it was mobile first. Now it's AI first. So hiring the chief AI officer, well, congratulations.

Faisal Masud [00:14:04]:
That one person in their team is not gonna solve the problem. The entire organization has to be moving in that direction. So I'm typically apprehensive of those types of moves because I feel they are they are not exactly going to entail in the whole org doing exactly what you expect. What you're mentioning is interesting because you could establish any policy you want at a large company. The employees at home and they've got their own machine. Mhmm. They're going to do whatever they want. How are you going to police that? And why would you do that? So I think if you want everybody to use your particular tools that you have put together at your enterprise or your company, then give them the world class tools so they don't have to look elsewhere.

Faisal Masud [00:14:47]:
Today, you can go and and do whatever you want in any of these options, whether it's OpenAI or Claude or DeepSeek or, Llama or what have you get so many options. So if your options are not gonna be the best, then employees are gonna do what they want. And and that's why you're seeing that the policy making is a bit loose because it's hard to manage. How are you going to manage that?

Jordan Wilson [00:15:11]:
Yeah. So how should they? Right? Like, again, like, you know, if we wanna solve this paradox, right, it's it's obviously easier said than done. You know? I'm sure, you know, AI policy is is somewhere has to be somewhere in there. Right? But for, you know, maybe our our c suite people out there that this conversation hits them in the gut. Right? And they're like, oh, man. This is probably happening a lot more than I realize, or maybe some are just turning a blind eye because things are going well. Right? Employees are happy. You you know, they're sticking around.

Jordan Wilson [00:15:43]:
Revenue's great. Right? So how can you actually solve this to make sure that employer employee relationship is, you know, quote, unquote, how it should be?

Faisal Masud [00:15:53]:
I think, organizations should should think about AI, in a in a super native way where every task that you do end to end, if it's enabled through, those agentic workflows that make your life easier, then you're avoiding forcing your employees to do that through outside tools. So whether it's filing a ticket, resolving a ticket, responding to, like if you look at just the Microsoft Suite, the Copilot edition inside Microsoft, it has helped people. Has it helped them as much as we thought it would? I don't know, but it has helped people. Now, Google, of course, coming out with their own versions with Gemini. I think, ultimately, the answer is unknown today. Why? Because there's so many options available outside that how can you prevent every employee from using those. So what do you do? You you find the best solutions internally and enable them with with that toolkit so they're not having to look outside. Very difficult to do.

Faisal Masud [00:16:54]:
I would say where it has helped a lot is AI is really good at the thought starting process, which is you can use these tools. The problem that employers have is it's their, data from their company that's being exposed to these, these platforms that they don't want happening. So what would you do? You should build versions of whether it's ChatGee, PTO or what have you internally that are super powerful that you don't have to go outside for your enterprise work. I don't think that's happened yet, though. Mhmm. A lot of dependency is still on the cloud based versions, whatever LMS you you can get out there. So I have a I

Jordan Wilson [00:17:32]:
have a very random question that just popped into my head. So, let's say, you know, HP Digital Services, you're starting a new, new arm or a new team. Right? And and you hire 10 new employees. After a year, all 10 are there, but you find out that maybe five of them, because of the AI tools that you used. Right? They've only been working, you know, ten hours a week. So five, you know, really, you know, got on to AI, not working very much. The other were working there, you know, forty, fifty hour week, whatever. Are are you mad at either group? Right? Like like, how can we as as as leaders, as as, you know, manage like, people in management, right, like, without literally looking over someone's shoulder, how do you deal with that? And are you mad at either group in that scenario?

Faisal Masud [00:18:25]:
I think it comes down to defining what the expectations are from the employees. If you define the expectation to be, you know, deliver x by y date and that is happening, I why would I be mad at anybody? And and if I expected more, then I should be mad at myself. Why am I getting mad at anybody else? Because the employees are doing exactly what they were asked to do. How they get to that end state is up to them. Now, obviously, those using AI are going to excel because they they'll have an accelerated pace of doing what they're doing, and and kudos to them.

Jordan Wilson [00:19:01]:
But, to the earlier point we talked about, you have to raise the bar. The, you know, when Amazon started shipping initially, it was free Super Saver shipping, which came in seven, eight days. That has now compressed down to next day most of the time, pretty much, for whatever you order. So the bar has been raised constantly, and look what it's done to other retailers. They've had to raise their bar. So, ultimately, it comes down to the employer and the manager having very clear expectations of what the employees do and encouraging them to use the capabilities of AI wherever possible and then sort of roll the dice after that and see where So it it almost seems like, you know, way more work, for people in management. Right? People that are, managing large remote teams. And and, you know, luckily, that's not me because I can only imagine the challenges, not just, you know, managing a large remote team at a, you know, fast moving, enterprise, but also just the rate of technology.

Jordan Wilson [00:20:04]:
Right? Because my 2¢, it doesn't move like like it it's never moved this quickly. Right? In terms of the capabilities, the fact that we have, you know, agentic models that can reason like a human and we can dump all our context. You know, it's it's kinda wild to think, that we have technology like that now, but it's like, okay. Do even all people in management know and understand that? You know, maybe maybe not. Right? So, what's what's your advice, I guess, for people that are managing large groups of remote teams? They are giving them AI tools, but it's just like they're not really sure what they're capable of.

Faisal Masud [00:20:39]:
Yeah. I mean, that's problematic. So if you've got a leadership team that doesn't have a clear understanding of, the capabilities of those, agentic tools, that's a that's a whole other problem to resolve than than you probably have the wrong team, because this is sort of table stakes at this point. You have to know what's available and what can be done. I think, the in in today's environment, especially in in what we do in in, workforce experience, you've got enough tools, that give you visibility into who's doing what to the degree that you want, where you have sprints every two weeks and you're delivering this and you're pushing this much code and here's what the product looks like. And velocity and quality are the two metrics that are most important in something like this. If you're getting the velocity you want and the bugs are not rising and the customers are happy, I think you don't have to overdo yourself. Just keep improving that, capability as much as possible.

Faisal Masud [00:21:39]:
I think where you leave everything static is where the problems occur. You start questioning your team. I'm not doing enough. Others are getting ahead. I don't think that's the answer. The answer is keeping up with the times yourself and raising the bar and all those metrics that you the track. And ultimately, is the customer experience getting better, faster?

Jordan Wilson [00:21:57]:
You know, one thing I I personally see companies make mistakes on is, you know, whether they're normally hiring, you know, a a group of 50 people, you know, annually, or, you know, someone leaves, someone retires, and they look for a replacement, right, for that person. I don't know. This might seem callous, but I don't think we should be hiring for human roles. Right? I think we should be hiring for augmented roles, but we're still I think, you you know, most organizations are still hiring, you you know, putting the, you know, KPIs, job descriptions, everything around what it looked like ten years ago, not what it looks like, you know, in a year or two. Right? But how can you solve for that? Right? How can we, you know, make sure our future people that we bring on our team, are are not just well prepared for the future of work, but how can you even make sure that your organization is nimble and agile enough to adjust to what the future of lurk work in an augmented, society looks like?

Faisal Masud [00:23:04]:
It's a really good question. And I think it it it it it also triggers another question, which is what got you here isn't gonna get you there. So let's just take an example. If you're in customer service and you're hiring customer service reps. Right? In the past, those reps were answering calls, answering emails, and and perhaps there's some text messaging as well that they were answering. Fast forward, if you were having departures in that, you probably heard about Klarna that where they where they said they reduced 75% or some I don't know the exact number, but we were they said they were able to reduce it by 50 or 75% without having to backfill. In fact, they said something like we've stopped backfilling. And then there was an article later that, no way, we we're actually backfilling now again.

Faisal Masud [00:23:46]:
So there there is no silver bullet to all of it, but I think what's important to know is what body of work can be done through the agents versus what body of work can absolutely not be done with the agents. And I'll give you my personal example. I, had a problem with my car and sent the obviously, the the message on on their chatbot or whatever it was, and the answers were not satisfactory. So to get the satisfaction, you had to talk to a person on the other side. Now you could argue, well, was that person AI? Was it an actual person? Well, I don't actually care. As long as my problem gets resolved, I'm good. But where we are today, you have to evaluate backfills. They can't be exactly what they were before.

Faisal Masud [00:24:29]:
So you're right. If somebody's in the in that role for many years, is it the same role? Don't know. So but that's the responsibility of the manager. Like, writing the JD, do the hard work. Write the JD. Be precise. Have the right expectations. Then tie them back to customer experience.

Faisal Masud [00:24:45]:
And if that's not gonna happen, then I think the problem is not the employee. It's actually you.

Jordan Wilson [00:24:50]:
It's a good point. It doesn't it doesn't sound easy. And and, yes, I'm I'm teeing this one up in a very, cheesy way. Right? So if you listen to, this show, you know, I always say, like, a you you know, AI is not an easy button. Right? Like, you you have to build it. You just can't, you know, click the easy button. I have to, like, I have to ask you this. See, you know, given given your background, Staples, the easy but AI.

Jordan Wilson [00:25:15]:
Can you quickly tell everyone the story, just of of how that easy button came to be and how you actually use AI? I I think it's such a fascinating story.

Faisal Masud [00:25:23]:
Yeah. It's a wild it's a wild one, which is, back in, I was at Staples, joined around 02/2013, and, I I realized that Staples had done an unbelievable job at marketing. They had this marketing gimmick, called the easy button, which obviously, had sold millions of units of the actual button itself that would just say for those who don't know, say that was easy. And, again, it was just a gimmick. It was just a marketing tool that was used in many places. We realized in our team, I ran the, the ecommerce business there. We realized that, time was coming that our buyers in on the B 2 B side did not really have to place orders every single time going into the website, placing the same orders every single week. Why don't we just make it easy? Just click a button and be done.

Faisal Masud [00:26:07]:
So in 02/2016, we launched the AI based easy button, which basically took about a thousand commands, and those commands were something as simple as order reorder me pens or take my return or where's my order, the typical questions. And we actually launched it, and deployed it to our, test customers. The the unfortunate part is it was powered through, back in the day, IBM Watson, which was, at that time, the leader, but too early, too soon. Great idea. Timing didn't quite work out, but, it's it's fascinating to see him back in the same similar roles now, many, many years later.

Jordan Wilson [00:26:47]:
Such a great story. Yeah. I would kick myself, you know, how much I talk about the easy button if I didn't, take that easy opportunity to ask you that. But, Fossil, we've we've we've covered a lot in today's conversation. Right? You you know, solving this, you know, AI productivity paradox. We poked at it from many different angles. But as we wrap up today's show, what's your one most important takeaway? Whether it's it's for business leaders and and, you know, quote, unquote, managers that that are managing people or whether it's employees, you you know, trying to scrap out even more, productivity. What's your biggest takeaway?

Faisal Masud [00:27:22]:
I think my takeaway is a combination of just my experiences in the past, and and what I would call out is Fabric where I was CEO. It was a venture backed startup, that the just hiring more people to do the work is usually not the answer. The employees are not happy. The employer is probably gonna struggle too. I think the less is more approach is probably quite valuable here. Do more with less. That doesn't mean put more work on the employees, but enable them through a toolkit and and, all of the capabilities that they can get the job done without having to hire armies of people. The last thing I'll say on this is that just having a very large team actually introduces a ton of complexity in just getting the work done.

Faisal Masud [00:28:06]:
So many handshakes along the way, so much bureaucracy. So if you do deploy the less is more approach where I don't know if you saw recently, Shopify also said that you know, we are going to evaluate every single hire, and look at if AI can do this. I think it's a right approach to look at because employees want really good work to work on that they can feel productive, And employers don't want to have a lot of people doing the same thing. So less is more, I would say, is the approach whether you're setting goals

Jordan Wilson [00:28:34]:
or otherwise. Fantastic parting words for, one of these scenarios that I think so many of us are going through and probably will be continuing to go through for a long time. So, Fossil, thank you so much for joining the Everyday AI Show and sharing your experience and insights. We really appreciate it. Thank you. Alright. As a reminder to y'all, that was a lot. Maybe you missed one of those nuggets in there and you're like, wait.

Jordan Wilson [00:29:00]:
What was that? Don't worry. We're gonna be recapping it all in our newsletter today. So if you haven't already, make sure to go to youreverydayai.com. Sign up for the free daily newsletter if this was helpful. Please tell someone about it. If you're sharing, on social media, don't don't let this be your cheat code. Right? We all need help to get through this together and to understand and grow our companies and our careers. So thank you for tuning in.

Jordan Wilson [00:29:21]:
Hope to see you back tomorrow and every day for more everyday AI. Thanks, y'all.

Gain Extra Insights With Our Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter to get more in-depth content on AI